In the early stage of platform development, it is often necessary to support head developers and create benchmark cases to attract more developers to settle in. Therefore, the head score at this stage is often higher than the waist and tail. With the further improvement of the ecology, the waist and tail gradually find a way to survive, and gradually narrow the gap with the head.
If the score of the waist and tail continues to be low, it means that the platform has insufficient potential for subsequent development. Similarly, if the head does not score as high as the waist and tail from the beginning to the end, it means that the job title email list demonstration role has not been established, and there is a risk of loss of high-quality resources. Both of these are signs of poor ecological health, and businesses need to be more vigilant.
The above lists two analysis angles for the evaluation model, of course, there are many other analysis angles, which will not be expanded one by one due to space limitations.
In general, business activities are complex, and evaluation methods can only be used as a tool to reflect market competition.
In order to understand the Mini Program ecology more thoroughly, it is also necessary to use the development stage as the context, use the evaluation tool to locate problems, continue to discover more interesting business phenomena, and help the business realize more value while deeply understanding the characteristics of the industry. You are also welcome to leave a message for discussion here.